With years of intensive research, no consensus about strategic value of IT reached. This may due to lack of divergent theoretical frameworks applied.
2 predominant conceptual bases are:
- Resource-centered view (IT as a strategic resource that when combined with other strategic resources directly influence org. performance)
- Production function view: Scale of IT resources [size of IT investments]: consider IT capital and labor to be independent production inputs that can affect a broad range of financial measures.
- Resource-based view: Scope of IT resources [nature or uniqueness of IT applications]: resources confer a competitive advantage to a firm only when they are firm-specific, valuable, rare, inimitable, and nonsubstitutable.
=> strategic resource can produce important benefits for firms (reducing costs and improving revenues)
- Contingency-based view (IT business alignment)
- IT resources per se may add little value and play a major role in improving a firm's performance only when they are planned and used to support a firm's main strategic objectives.
- A possible explanation for the inconsistent findings presented could be that different studies have used different approaches to conceptualize SAIT and measure its effect on org. performance.
=> fit: the degree to which the needs, demands, goals, objectives, and/or structure of one component are consistent with the needs, demands, goals, objectives and/or structure of another component. Extent:
- Adaptation (personal - org)
- Compatibility (individual-org)
- Assimilation (org - org)
- Coupling (inter-exter org)
=> focusing on how IT strategy is developed and implemented in conjunction with business strategy => which the IT portfolio of IT applications is aligned with the business objectives of the firm.
The dynamics of unpredictable environments call for a research approach that can fully capture the relationship between bus. strategy, IT strategy and performance.
Components of SAIT:
- Cost-reduction: most efficient producer (minimize operation
- Quality-improvement:
- Revenue-growth:
=> IT alignment with cost reduction strategy generate more immediate and tangible benefits for firms than IT-strategy alignment that aims to facilitate revenue growth.
=> extracting benefits from strategic IS resources designed to help firms grow is more difficult than extracting benefits from operational IS resources developed to cut costs.
Bibliography:
Oh, Wonseok, and Alain Pinsonneault. "On the assessment of the strategic value of information technologies: conceptual and analytical approaches."MIS quarterly (2007): 239-265.
Perhaps value assessment is difficult, how about turning the question on its head and address cost assessment AND risk or loss assessment?
ReplyDeleteYeah, love it ^^. Thanks for the advise.
Delete